Menu
Back to AI and Diagnosis
08/01/23

Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI).

Lång, Kristina; Josefsson, Viktoria; Larsson, Anna-Maria; Larsson, Stefan; Högberg, Charlotte; Sartor, Hanna; Hofvind, Solveig; Andersson, Ingvar; Rosso, Aldana. Lancet Oncol.

Collection Topics
AI and Diagnosis Big Three Conditions Tests, Screening, and Laboratory Processes
Share

Most recent

Primary care signals and diagnostic pathways before incident heart failure: a systematic scoping review.

Jerjes, El-Osta, Jhass, et al., J Prim Care Community Health.
09/09/26 Big Three Conditions Culture, Work System, and Implementation Epidemiology

Emergency department revisit quality review screening: exploring human decision-making and artificial intelligence support.

Handler, Robles-Granda, Mefford, et al., arXiv
09/09/26 AI and Diagnosis Measurement, Monitoring, and Event Analysis

A five-phase evaluation framework for diagnostic and predictive medical artificial intelligence.

Ye, Chen, Huang, et al., NPJ Digit Med.
09/03/26 AI and Diagnosis

Summary

Retrospective studies have shown artificial intelligence (AI) to be at least as accurate as radiologists in detecting breast cancer in screening mammograms. This prospective randomized trial similarly demonstrated that AI readings were as accurate as double readings by radiologists, but with a significantly reduced workload. 

The PSNet collection materials were developed with funding under multiple contracts from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Read the paper
Lång K, Josefsson V, Larsson A-M, et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single…. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(8):936-944.