Menu
Back to AI and Diagnosis
05/25/26

Patients' perspectives on the implementation of AI in radiological diagnostics: focus group study.

Karger, Cornelia R. J Med Internet Res.

Collection Topics
AI and Diagnosis Patients and Families as Partners Tests, Screening, and Laboratory Processes
Share

Most recent

Emergency department revisit quality review screening: exploring human decision-making and artificial intelligence support.

Handler, Robles-Granda, Mefford, et al., arXiv
09/09/26 AI and Diagnosis Measurement, Monitoring, and Event Analysis

A five-phase evaluation framework for diagnostic and predictive medical artificial intelligence.

Ye, Chen, Huang, et al., NPJ Digit Med.
09/03/26 AI and Diagnosis

A detection, diagnostic, and triage AI buyer’s guide: questions that matter.

Baird, Bernstein, Chambers, et al., J Digit Imaging Inform Med.
09/03/26 AI and Diagnosis Culture, Work System, and Implementation

Summary

Successful implementation of AI in diagnosis requires patient trust as well as technical performance. This German focus-group study engaged 34 patients across seven groups to explore expectations and concerns about AI-assisted radiological diagnosis. The results indicate patients want evidence of the safety and added value AI would bring and reflect that a sociotechnical orientation to AI is necessary for full acceptance of its use. Concerns discussed include excessive clinician reliance on AI and the potential erosion of the physician-patient relationship.
Read the paper
Karger CR. Patients’ perspectives on the implementation of AI in radiological diagnostics: focus group study. J Med Internet Res. 2026;28:e89178.