CODEX Digest 05.07.26

Here Are This Week’s Must Reads:

Tabaie, Tran, Parau, et al.

Applying machine learning and natural language processing to patient safety event reports: Identifying patterns of cardiovascular diagnostic errors.

Patient safety report analysis can provide important avenues for error identification and improvement opportunities. This study explores using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to identify cardiovascular diagnostic errors from patient safety event reports. Findings demonstrate feasibility, bridging data science methods with patient safety needs. This approach can enhance surveillance of diagnostic errors, supporting quality improvement efforts in cardiovascular care.

Faulkner, Eakin, Smith, et al.

Butterflies in the field: introducing point-of-care ultrasound to paramedics in rural and wilderness emergency medical services.

In rural and wilderness settings, paramedics often manage patients during long transports with limited resources. This prospective study found that training paramedics to use point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was feasible, well accepted, and helped support patient care and transport decisions. Wider implementation and further research could clarify its effects on clinician performance, diagnostic accuracy, and patient outcomes in remote environments.

Arda, Panossian, Nzenwa, et al.

Cognitive bias and diagnostic overshadowing in trauma: The case of substance use disorder in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Diagnostic overshadowing occurs when a pre-existing condition influences the assessment of other diagnoses. This study examines how substance use disorder (SUD) affects the time to surgical intervention in patients with traumatic brain injuries, revealing that SUD leads to delays in care. The findings demonstrate that diagnostic overshadowing impacts surgical timeliness and is measurable.

Harada, Harada, Kunitomo, et al.

Diagnostic errors in abdominal pain: a secondary analysis of case reports.

Diagnostic errors are common in patients with abdominal pain. This study found that errors often stem from misinterpreting physical exams or imaging findings and difficulty distinguishing between conditions within the same organ system. Improving bedside assessment skills, using structured differential diagnosis approaches, and strengthening radiology support may help reduce errors and improve patient safety.

Chamberland, Boulais, Setrakian, et al.

Embedding clinical reasoning into an undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-stakeholder perspective.

Canadian medical educators recognize the need for deliberate clinical reasoning (CR) instruction at the pre-clinical level, though integration into real-time education remains unclear. This focus group study finds that medical students gained diverse CR knowledge during their courses and applied it to diagnostics, history-taking, and clinical problem-solving. Broader stakeholder experiences captured largely aligned with curriculum goals but highlighted some difficulties. Results show CR can be integrated in undergraduate curricula, though challenges exist.

Rao, Esmail, Lee, et al.

Large language model performance and clinical reasoning tasks.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly promoted for clinical use, but their ability to support real-world clinical reasoning remains uncertain. This cross-sectional study found that while LLMs were often accurate in identifying final diagnoses, they performed poorly in generating differential diagnoses and managing uncertainty. The authors propose a multidimensional benchmark to better assess the safe clinical deployment of AI tools.

Chau, Spuur, White, et al.

Malpractice in the machine age: legal and ethical responses to machine learning in medical imaging.

AI and machine learning are increasingly used in diagnostic imaging, impacting malpractice risk, legal standards, liability, and informed consent. While AI can boost accuracy and efficiency, its adoption raises potential negligence claims if clinicians misuse or fail to use validated tools. Liability is unclear due to shared responsibility among clinicians, organizations, and developers, and traditional frameworks lack clear accountability for AI-related errors. Clear guidelines on responsibility, decision-making, and validation are vital for patient safety and clinician protection.

Robles, Abel, Black, et al.

“One of the hardest things in medicine is challenging an initial diagnosis.” Interim diagnoses and missed opportunities for diagnosing cancer in primary care: a qualitative study.

Patients with undiagnosed cancer may first receive an alternative “interim” diagnosis, potentially delaying cancer detection. This study examines healthcare professionals’ views on when interim diagnoses occur, their impact on cancer diagnosis, and triggers for prompt review. Key factors included diagnostic uncertainty, non-specific symptoms, and remote consultations limiting information. While delays were common, safety-netting and team-based “fresh eyes” discussions enabled timely review.

Blease, Jones, Blease, et al.

Patient and family perspectives on generative artificial intelligence tools in rare diseases: an exploratory mixed methods online survey. 

Generative AI (GenAI) tools are increasingly used by patients and families seeking diagnoses of rare diseases. This preprint study explores their active use of GenAI for information, preparation, and advocacy, despite their concerns about reliability and safety. The results reveal the concealed behaviors associated with patient-driven GenAI use outside the clinical environment. Improved patient-centered design, education, and governance are necessary to ensure GenAI helps reduce—not worsen—inequities in rare disease care.

Ryckman, Peters, Parker, et al.

Perinatal depression screening and diagnosis: identifying opportunities to improve optimal care.

Perinatal depression (PND) is a common but serious complication. This single-system study examines racial, ethnic, and sociodemographic disparities in PND screening and diagnosis. Results show that historically marginalized groups are more likely to be screened but less likely to be diagnosed. These findings reveal critical inequities, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable care.

Martin, J

Safety reporting, analysis and learning in optimisation of radiological protection for medical imaging.

Radiation safety culture is increasingly recognized as essential to improving diagnostic imaging safety. This review highlights recent advances in implementing radiological protection practices, emphasizing safety reporting, learning from errors, regular performance review, and continuous improvement in imaging services to reduce radiation risks and prevent safety incidents.

Pesapane, Depretto, Rotili, et al.

Should AI results be disclosed in mammography reports? A randomised survey study of patient responses to concordant and discordant interpretations.

As AI becomes more integrated into clinical care, clear communication with patients about AI findings will be critical. This Italian randomized survey study found that disclosing AI results that conflicted with a radiologist’s interpretation reduced patient's trust, increased their anxiety, and raised their interest in second opinions and legal action. Providing brief context for discordant AI findings may help maintain trust and reduce unnecessary concern.